The world gets more bizarre every single day and people, if you can call them that, get more fluent in stupidity. Case in point, Dennis P. McCann. His latest rant shows an impressive amount of stupidity:
http://internetstalkerx3.blogspot.com/2014/04/the-sword-of-damocles.html
I will however commend him on his declaration that "Rip-Off Report" is a scam. He finally got something correct! The rest of the rant is more of the same warped display of thoughts he typically displays. He must think that people will care about his rants decades from now.
Myself and Noel Bednaz were made the subject of an elementary school style "Rip-Off Report" recently that even Helen Keller would be able to detect as being phony. Read about it here:
http://abusevictimsunited.blogspot.com/2014/04/rip-off-report-extortionist-ed-magedson.html
The fruitcake who operates "Rip-Off Report" Ed Magedson, truly looks like a leftover specimen from the "Flower Power" era that was regurgitated into the New Millenium:
This nutter deserves to be tossed back through the space-time portal he crawled out from and sent into another dimension where he can be properly dissected by aliens. Some living being needs to find out what makes Mr. Ed tick. (Not the horse of course)
The person or persons responsible for the phony report about myself and Noel, clearly lack the concept of authentic reality. Unless people know specifically what to look for, that phony report will not be viewed. Additionally, the only ones who care about it besides the author, do not even count because they are all part of the same ball of clay. We can go by any identity we choose and nobody will be any the wiser. Consequently, the author of the phony report wasted his or her time because it will not matter to the average Joe who has never had any dealings with the subject or subjects that were written about.
Ultimately, it does not matter what people say or refer to us as. It is what we answer to that is pertinent. It does not even matter what strangers think because they do not know us at all. How we view ourselves is what counts.
Internet Stalker Dennis
A compilation of evidence and information archiving the cyberstalking activities of Dennis P. McCann, who has stalked Noel A. Bednaz since the year 2000.
Saturday, April 12, 2014
Wednesday, April 9, 2014
Thank You Dennis P. McCann! Quite A Good Show I Must Say.
Bravo! The nutter from Turkey has reached a new level of insanity! I applaud you, really I do Dennis P. McCann for your gumption to make a bigger ass out of yourself. Outstanding! If I am Noel Bednaz, then you are the Tooth Fairy.
Regarding the domain Noel purchased, not me, there is a good reason the money was "shelled" out as you put it. With an official domain, Noel Bednaz has succeeded in leveling out the playing field and thus, gaining greater control over your weak stifling efforts. Noel owns the name "Abuse Victims United" and you can not take that away. Unlike the average non-domain website, Noel's registered domain can be carried over to any web hosting service. Additionally, the search engines tend to pay more attention to registered domains. Not that it is any of your business, but you now have a valid explanation anyhow for why the domain was registered and those who view this blog will see it too.
What is your explanation for continuing to attack Noel after you were presented evidence of reasonable doubt as to the possibility of someone else sending you the infamous Christmas Eve e-mail that inspired you to reignite a cyber war after seven years of silence? Please, choose your words carefully. I do not want to hear the same old blather about how you are merely documenting Noel's alleged stalking activities when most by now can already see that is not the case. What you have is evidence that someone sent you things via e-mail, subscribed you to porn websites, supposedly impersonated you, ect, ect. You have no tangible proof that someone was Noel Bednaz. You assume without solid facts. You claim to have solid facts but fail to produce anything tangible when asked. You dance around it instead and blame Noel for your misfortune.
Additionally, you have criminal records that do not have a thing to do with you and they have nothing to do with stalking issues either. Those records are not even accessible from a Massachusetts court access website. This means they are only accessible because you made them that way. The "convicted stalker" label you have slapped on Noel do not support anything written in the original court records anyhow. You say it and everyone is supposed to believe it.
Noel has tried to ignore you and the supporters have advised accordingly. You call them fakes or "sock puppets" to mask your fear of their possible existence. They do exist. I exist, you sadly exist, and everyone who has stepped up to you on Noel's behalf exist. Try as you will, denial of this will not alter the facts.
I am granting you this opportunity to back up your words. None of this blaming Noel Bednaz and playing the victim game routine. Just the facts is all I or anyone else involved is interested in. When a young woman who wrote to you in the past asked if you could be wrong about Noel Bednaz, you stated you could be but "Occam's razor" suggests that you are not. This indicates an admission that you have to believe Noel Bednaz is the guilty party regardless of what tangible proof is presented before you to the contrary. Furthermore, this is the propaganda that you desire for the public to believe in order to proceed with your cause.
Based on your own actions and words, one can deduce that you do not desire anything more than to cause as much harm to the image of Noel Bednaz as possible. When you pour gasoline on a campfire, it flares up higher and can easily burn out of control. This situation much like a campfire that has been doused with gasoline, could have been prevented entirely. Fourteen years ago, the fire was lit but later burned out. For a seven year period, you both had peace. This could have continued if only you had not returned with the gasoline. You tried to blame the fire on Noel but this person did not light the match this time. Do you understand what I am trying to say here? You do not realize it, but your inability to look to anyone else as the fire starter reduces your credibility. Especially when "Larry Melton" had motive and opportunity to set up Noel. Look at his blog and compare it to the Christmas Eve e-mail. I know, that is too hard of a task for you to muster up to doing. Right?
You now have the opportunity to plead your case without all the propaganda, blame game tactics, or routine drawn-out speeches portraying yourself as the victim. I want to see tangible proof that Noel Bednaz is the guilty party. Other than the websites, blogs, petitions, and Facebook pages this person created in defense, the rest of your website does not prove guilt. You present it as something it is not and use the old court records to make people believe your words. If you did not have those, others might not be as inclined to believe you. Leave your response here in the comment section. I do not care which. Be advised that what you say next can and will be used against you depending on the content. I look forward to your reply.
Regarding the domain Noel purchased, not me, there is a good reason the money was "shelled" out as you put it. With an official domain, Noel Bednaz has succeeded in leveling out the playing field and thus, gaining greater control over your weak stifling efforts. Noel owns the name "Abuse Victims United" and you can not take that away. Unlike the average non-domain website, Noel's registered domain can be carried over to any web hosting service. Additionally, the search engines tend to pay more attention to registered domains. Not that it is any of your business, but you now have a valid explanation anyhow for why the domain was registered and those who view this blog will see it too.
What is your explanation for continuing to attack Noel after you were presented evidence of reasonable doubt as to the possibility of someone else sending you the infamous Christmas Eve e-mail that inspired you to reignite a cyber war after seven years of silence? Please, choose your words carefully. I do not want to hear the same old blather about how you are merely documenting Noel's alleged stalking activities when most by now can already see that is not the case. What you have is evidence that someone sent you things via e-mail, subscribed you to porn websites, supposedly impersonated you, ect, ect. You have no tangible proof that someone was Noel Bednaz. You assume without solid facts. You claim to have solid facts but fail to produce anything tangible when asked. You dance around it instead and blame Noel for your misfortune.
Additionally, you have criminal records that do not have a thing to do with you and they have nothing to do with stalking issues either. Those records are not even accessible from a Massachusetts court access website. This means they are only accessible because you made them that way. The "convicted stalker" label you have slapped on Noel do not support anything written in the original court records anyhow. You say it and everyone is supposed to believe it.
Noel has tried to ignore you and the supporters have advised accordingly. You call them fakes or "sock puppets" to mask your fear of their possible existence. They do exist. I exist, you sadly exist, and everyone who has stepped up to you on Noel's behalf exist. Try as you will, denial of this will not alter the facts.
I am granting you this opportunity to back up your words. None of this blaming Noel Bednaz and playing the victim game routine. Just the facts is all I or anyone else involved is interested in. When a young woman who wrote to you in the past asked if you could be wrong about Noel Bednaz, you stated you could be but "Occam's razor" suggests that you are not. This indicates an admission that you have to believe Noel Bednaz is the guilty party regardless of what tangible proof is presented before you to the contrary. Furthermore, this is the propaganda that you desire for the public to believe in order to proceed with your cause.
Based on your own actions and words, one can deduce that you do not desire anything more than to cause as much harm to the image of Noel Bednaz as possible. When you pour gasoline on a campfire, it flares up higher and can easily burn out of control. This situation much like a campfire that has been doused with gasoline, could have been prevented entirely. Fourteen years ago, the fire was lit but later burned out. For a seven year period, you both had peace. This could have continued if only you had not returned with the gasoline. You tried to blame the fire on Noel but this person did not light the match this time. Do you understand what I am trying to say here? You do not realize it, but your inability to look to anyone else as the fire starter reduces your credibility. Especially when "Larry Melton" had motive and opportunity to set up Noel. Look at his blog and compare it to the Christmas Eve e-mail. I know, that is too hard of a task for you to muster up to doing. Right?
You now have the opportunity to plead your case without all the propaganda, blame game tactics, or routine drawn-out speeches portraying yourself as the victim. I want to see tangible proof that Noel Bednaz is the guilty party. Other than the websites, blogs, petitions, and Facebook pages this person created in defense, the rest of your website does not prove guilt. You present it as something it is not and use the old court records to make people believe your words. If you did not have those, others might not be as inclined to believe you. Leave your response here in the comment section. I do not care which. Be advised that what you say next can and will be used against you depending on the content. I look forward to your reply.
Confirmed! Dennis P. McCann Supports Registered Sex Offenders.
To the folks reading, what I stated previously has been confirmed by the recent horrendous blog rantings of Dennis P. McCann, the Internet stalker without a conscience. After being made aware of the possibility another culprit had reason and motive to frame Noel Bednaz for the infamous Christmas Eve e-mail Dennis received and even after it being stated any future attacks would prove he obviously supports registered sex offenders, this "Artist" as he likes to refer to himself as shows how severely mentally unbalanced he truly is. Why does he continue his attacks when he knows he will only lose? Does he honestly think Noel will give up simply because he files false reports to stifle this person? Your guess is as good as mine. I received a message from Noel stating the following:
{No matter what he does, I will come out swinging. If anything, his attacks against me prove a relevant fact, that he is MY stalker and the truth being revealed for a change scares the hell out of him. He has been trying to silence me for years with no success because I keep fighting back. The more he comes at me, the more vigilant I'm going to be against his attacks. I'm NEVER going to give up and I'll continue making the truth known to everyone while he shows himself to be the stalker that he is. His pathetic statements that I can't use my own domain is ridiculous because I most certainly CAN use it and I am right now. Redirects to my blogs and other sites are the best way to prevent him from stealing away all I have achieved. I don't need to have a hosted website like him to be a success. All I need is what I have already, a keen mind and a desire to come out on top. Unlike him, I'm not a loser;) He should know by now that he can have a million websites closed due to his own fears and insecurities but that won't stop me from completing my mission which is to expose his abuse and help other victims like myself. He can gloat and thump himself on the chest figuring he scored a victory but what he doesn't realize is that each time he attacks me on his bullshit blog and libelous website, each time he accuses ME of the offenses that HE is doing, and each time he tries to stifle me, he is giving more credibility to the statements I have made about him. He is MY stalker and he is proving it with each abusive act he performs. He calls it "presenting evidence" but that's not the truth at all. Dennis is just putting on a smear campaign because he can't stand to see me rise above his abuse. He would rather I just lay down and die for him which I refuse to do. I will NOT remain silent just so HE can stay comfortable! If he wants to keep coming after me, he can bring it on because I'm NOT going down for him! He can also accuse my supporters of being "sock-puppets" just to further his illegitimate cause but that won't make anything sway to HIS favor. If anything, he will continue proving himself to be the stalker he has always been and I will just have to keep fighting to protect what is mine. I have no problem doing that. It's all routine anyway.}
I could not have said it any better. According to Dennis P. McCann, the narcissist from Turkey however, he might imply that I already have due to his belief Noel and I are the same person. He does this often so he can avoid facing his own failures in life. What a pitiful old man he is. Remember when I said that what he posts next after reviewing the facts about "Larry Melton" the registered sex offender will say a great deal about the content of his character? Indeed I was proven correct and Dennis P. McCann is a supporter of the vermin that harms little children. Any authentic victim would do anything to get to the truth about who really started things up again after seven years. Not Dennis though. Instead, he wants to gratify himself by attacking Noel. Wait, you will see when he publishes his next update. He will try and play off that he is not attacking Noel but his own libelous words will speak in volumes. His further preventative actions to stop Noel from revealing the truth about his persistent abuse will make it more obvious that he has something to hide. As the old saying goes, he can run but he can not hide.
{No matter what he does, I will come out swinging. If anything, his attacks against me prove a relevant fact, that he is MY stalker and the truth being revealed for a change scares the hell out of him. He has been trying to silence me for years with no success because I keep fighting back. The more he comes at me, the more vigilant I'm going to be against his attacks. I'm NEVER going to give up and I'll continue making the truth known to everyone while he shows himself to be the stalker that he is. His pathetic statements that I can't use my own domain is ridiculous because I most certainly CAN use it and I am right now. Redirects to my blogs and other sites are the best way to prevent him from stealing away all I have achieved. I don't need to have a hosted website like him to be a success. All I need is what I have already, a keen mind and a desire to come out on top. Unlike him, I'm not a loser;) He should know by now that he can have a million websites closed due to his own fears and insecurities but that won't stop me from completing my mission which is to expose his abuse and help other victims like myself. He can gloat and thump himself on the chest figuring he scored a victory but what he doesn't realize is that each time he attacks me on his bullshit blog and libelous website, each time he accuses ME of the offenses that HE is doing, and each time he tries to stifle me, he is giving more credibility to the statements I have made about him. He is MY stalker and he is proving it with each abusive act he performs. He calls it "presenting evidence" but that's not the truth at all. Dennis is just putting on a smear campaign because he can't stand to see me rise above his abuse. He would rather I just lay down and die for him which I refuse to do. I will NOT remain silent just so HE can stay comfortable! If he wants to keep coming after me, he can bring it on because I'm NOT going down for him! He can also accuse my supporters of being "sock-puppets" just to further his illegitimate cause but that won't make anything sway to HIS favor. If anything, he will continue proving himself to be the stalker he has always been and I will just have to keep fighting to protect what is mine. I have no problem doing that. It's all routine anyway.}
I could not have said it any better. According to Dennis P. McCann, the narcissist from Turkey however, he might imply that I already have due to his belief Noel and I are the same person. He does this often so he can avoid facing his own failures in life. What a pitiful old man he is. Remember when I said that what he posts next after reviewing the facts about "Larry Melton" the registered sex offender will say a great deal about the content of his character? Indeed I was proven correct and Dennis P. McCann is a supporter of the vermin that harms little children. Any authentic victim would do anything to get to the truth about who really started things up again after seven years. Not Dennis though. Instead, he wants to gratify himself by attacking Noel. Wait, you will see when he publishes his next update. He will try and play off that he is not attacking Noel but his own libelous words will speak in volumes. His further preventative actions to stop Noel from revealing the truth about his persistent abuse will make it more obvious that he has something to hide. As the old saying goes, he can run but he can not hide.
Monday, March 3, 2014
Case Study: What Dennis P. McCann Says And Why He Stalks.
Dennis P. McCann, stalker of Noel A. Bednaz, likes to be the center of attention and I am not one to disappoint. First, I will point out the most popular things Dennis says and does when confronted about his various illegal actions:
1. When confronted on his stalking, he always says things like: "Noel is the stalker", "Noel is lying", "The proof is on the website", and then he proceeds to post the link any place he sees fit or where ever he has chased Noel down to.
2. When certain facts are brought to light and he is asked to explain things, he says things like: "Never happened", "So once again we have an example of Noel attempting to lie her way out of a lie after being caught lying", "She is a convicted criminal and a liar", Mark Smith is Noel Bednaz", "And this disproves the claim that the Dockets are on this site illegally", and other times, he simply skirts around the truth by avoiding answering any legitimate questions. Another tactic he uses is trying to discredit me by claiming I am Noel. Case in point, the final update I posted on my other blog:
http://the-dennis-p-mccann-story.blogspot.com/
Dennis claims to have "disproved" my claims while claiming his facts are legitimate. All he does is claim, claim claim. He has no real defense although he likes to claim he does.
Now, I will point out the various things Dennis whines about constantly much like a baby wanting to be fed or have a diaper change and the things he brags about to increase his level of importance:
1. "I'm still being harassed, maligned and libeled, my copyrights are still being infringed". (The "copyright infringement" term was adopted from online scammer Ben Gurecki. Dennis never used this term before that nutter did. He will probably deny it though.)
2. "I'm a University Professor with paintings on five continents". (Whoop-A-Dee-Doo!)
3. "Apologize to my dead mother, admit to all the things you've done, take down the blogs/websites, and all this goes away". (What he says to Noel as he is blackmailing this person. How the hell do you apologize to a rotting corpse anyhow?)
When Dennis is not blackmailing, libeling, and mowing down Noel's reputation, he is making empty threats such as this:
"A simple flight to MASS and a cab ride to the Police Dept. in your town and we could see what all this evidence would really amount to".
Just what does he think this will accomplish and why would any PD outside of Turkey entertain such foolishness from a nutter who does not even live in their jurisdiction? I guess you would have to ask Dennis that one.
Each of Dennis's actions has a purpose and they are not as honorable as he tries to make them out to be. He has a sick obsession with Noel Bednaz and the proof is displayed all over his libelous website. He has published this person's name more times than can be counted on both hands and feet. The biggest display is on the front page where a bold headline states: "Noel A. Bednaz of Westfield Massachusetts is a Cyber-Stalker" despite this person not living in the area anymore. This is the fantasy world Dennis wants to live in however and I guess I am nobody to deprive him of the privilege to make himself look stupid.
His obsession has no boundaries as proven recently when he conducted a background check so he could track Noel. What the background check failed to show is where this person is now. The reason why it shows only Noel's old address is because there is nothing in this person's former or current name at the new address. Noel felt it was necessary to do this for protection against Dennis. This is a common practice with stalking victims. The predators on the other hand like Dennis do everything in their power to track their target where ever they go.
You might be wondering how I know all this and I will tell you. It is not because I am a "sock puppet" of Noel's as Dennis prefers to call me. I am in close contact with this person and I was granted the right to tell Noel's story. Dennis will surely make a big deal over this and discredit me in the next round of his lie fest but I need not be concerned. I know who I am and what I am talking about. Dennis on the other hand, does not.
The hold Noel has over Dennis is astonishing. He obsesses over this person day and night while Noel is simply trying to move on with life. Why does he do this? The reason is simple. Much like a heroin addict needs a fix, Dennis crawls out of his skin when he fails to get a reaction out of Noel. He gets high off Noel and relishes in making this person's life pure misery. Dissatisfied with his own life, his mission is to take what he can from Noel's life and leave an innocent person there for dead. Assassinating Noel's reputation is how he achieves this goal.
He knows like anybody else that the sanctity of a person's good name is extremely valuable. Once that gets ruined, a person has nothing left to lose aside from their own lives. If Noel was to die, that would be Dennis's final victory because then, he could take no more away. The only thing he could do in the aftermath is make himself look more like an insensitive creep by defaming Noel's character beyond human life. This is not something I personally would put past Dennis because he is a maniacal monster.
Dennis likes to portray his website as a "public service" but in actuality, it serves primarily as a means for him to have sweet mental revenge against Noel. Anybody who would invest fourteen years of his life to engage in activities designed to break down another human being truly needs psychological help. Attacking Noel gives Dennis's life more meaning and this is the reason he continues to do it. He sees what he does as necessary but it is only that to him and anybody else looking for a way to get back at Noel through Dennis. They are just as horrid as he is.
Dennis's website is based mainly on his own personal belief that Noel has done all these bad things to him. Only a fraction of the website can be considered credible such as the documentation of websites, groups, petitions, and blogs Noel had previously created about him as a defense tactic after he began his attacks in his groups, all of which he lost as the result of his own ignorance. The court records are in the past but Dennis prefers to keep them current despite the cases having nothing to do with him and all but two being formally dismissed. This is the fact Dennis repeatedly debunks so he can successfully avoid the realization that it was because of the letter he wrote to the courts and materials he furnished that made it possible for Noel to be exonerated. He can remain in denial about this all he wants to but he can never erase the judge's decision to dismiss those cases. Dennis can only hold it over Noel like a life sentence to preserve his precious image by making his lies appear more credible. The cases essentially were none of his business or the public's until he made them that way.
The rest of what he has on there amounts to someone sending him inappropriate e-cards, malicious e-mails, utilizing fake e-mailers, ect. Someone sent them but it does not mean it was Noel. Dennis just likes to claim it was this person to make the website more interesting and damaging to Noel's character.
The infamous Christmas Eve 2012 e-mail is what inspired Dennis to resume his attacks against Noel. He remains fixated on the theory that Noel sent the e-mail in question. Apparently, it never occurred to him that perhaps someone who had it in for Noel was in fact responsible for this. See below the original e-mail which Dennis has proudly presented on his website and used as an excuse to lash out at Noel. You may have to click on the screen shot to view it fully:
All because of this measly, meaningless e-mail, Dennis restarted a cyber war. This could have easily been ignored but then, Dennis would have no meaning to his own life without Noel. Below is a screen shot taken from the blog of the individual I believe is responsible for the e-mail:
See the similarities in writing style? All in "CAPS" just like the e-mail and the general message is clearly against Noel. Who is this character? I will now tell you. He may go by "White Rabbitt" online but his real name is Larry Melton aka Joseph Gallagher and he is a registered sex offender. See the page below for proof:
http://sexoffenders.kens5.com/offender/melton-larry/4736748
and some screen shots from the page in case the information should ever become unavailable:
All perfectly legitimate information on public record unlike the court records Dennis published about Noel that even a background check failed to turn up. Anybody who claims Noel's records are part of the public domain needs their heads examined by a licensed professional. Larry Melton on the other hand should rightfully be considered a prime suspect because of his writing style matching that of the e-mail, his open negative comments about Noel, and the fact he is low enough to be a sex offender, a genuine criminal unlike Noel who was wrongly accused of lesser offenses and has kept out of trouble ever since. It should additionally be noted that Noel was once friendly with Larry Melton before discovering his sordid past. The ties were quickly severed after the discovery that he likes looking at kiddie porn.
I feel I can say with complete certainty, Dennis will attempt to "disprove" this entire article so he can salvage what is left of his dignity. More lies will follow and he might even defend Larry Melton who incidentally is a Charles Manson devotee as shown by the "X" on his forehead. Even Manson himself would be appalled. I can not reveal the identity of the person who led me in the direction of Larry Melton but I will say this person was very close to him and knows him well. If Dennis after seeing this evidence which I feel supports the reasonable doubt theory tries to debunk it in any way by continuing to lay the blame on Noel and/or absolving Larry Melton of any possible responsibility for that Christmas Eve e-mail, then he obviously supports low-life registered sex offenders. For all I know, Dennis could be into that sort of thing himself. If by some strange miracle Dennis admits there is a possibility Larry Melton could have sent the e-mail, this will not only shed a different light on Noel but it will show there is possible hope for Dennis. Either way, the facts I have presented here are tangible and should be taken into consideration. This is a win-win situation for Noel anyhow regardless of the outcome.
What Dennis posts next after reviewing these facts will say a great deal about the content of his character. A true victim would want to get to the bottom of things rather than remain closed off to the possibility someone else could be responsible for attacking them. Dennis can no longer claim to be a victim if he resumes his attacks against Noel after this, and claiming I am doing the writing will not help his case. He will instead prove himself to be the one and only predator. Only that type of individual keeps posting nonsense despite being ignored by his/her target and by disregarding key evidence such as what I have presented here. This article is now concluded.
1. When confronted on his stalking, he always says things like: "Noel is the stalker", "Noel is lying", "The proof is on the website", and then he proceeds to post the link any place he sees fit or where ever he has chased Noel down to.
2. When certain facts are brought to light and he is asked to explain things, he says things like: "Never happened", "So once again we have an example of Noel attempting to lie her way out of a lie after being caught lying", "She is a convicted criminal and a liar", Mark Smith is Noel Bednaz", "And this disproves the claim that the Dockets are on this site illegally", and other times, he simply skirts around the truth by avoiding answering any legitimate questions. Another tactic he uses is trying to discredit me by claiming I am Noel. Case in point, the final update I posted on my other blog:
http://the-dennis-p-mccann-story.blogspot.com/
Dennis claims to have "disproved" my claims while claiming his facts are legitimate. All he does is claim, claim claim. He has no real defense although he likes to claim he does.
Now, I will point out the various things Dennis whines about constantly much like a baby wanting to be fed or have a diaper change and the things he brags about to increase his level of importance:
1. "I'm still being harassed, maligned and libeled, my copyrights are still being infringed". (The "copyright infringement" term was adopted from online scammer Ben Gurecki. Dennis never used this term before that nutter did. He will probably deny it though.)
2. "I'm a University Professor with paintings on five continents". (Whoop-A-Dee-Doo!)
3. "Apologize to my dead mother, admit to all the things you've done, take down the blogs/websites, and all this goes away". (What he says to Noel as he is blackmailing this person. How the hell do you apologize to a rotting corpse anyhow?)
When Dennis is not blackmailing, libeling, and mowing down Noel's reputation, he is making empty threats such as this:
"A simple flight to MASS and a cab ride to the Police Dept. in your town and we could see what all this evidence would really amount to".
Just what does he think this will accomplish and why would any PD outside of Turkey entertain such foolishness from a nutter who does not even live in their jurisdiction? I guess you would have to ask Dennis that one.
Each of Dennis's actions has a purpose and they are not as honorable as he tries to make them out to be. He has a sick obsession with Noel Bednaz and the proof is displayed all over his libelous website. He has published this person's name more times than can be counted on both hands and feet. The biggest display is on the front page where a bold headline states: "Noel A. Bednaz of Westfield Massachusetts is a Cyber-Stalker" despite this person not living in the area anymore. This is the fantasy world Dennis wants to live in however and I guess I am nobody to deprive him of the privilege to make himself look stupid.
His obsession has no boundaries as proven recently when he conducted a background check so he could track Noel. What the background check failed to show is where this person is now. The reason why it shows only Noel's old address is because there is nothing in this person's former or current name at the new address. Noel felt it was necessary to do this for protection against Dennis. This is a common practice with stalking victims. The predators on the other hand like Dennis do everything in their power to track their target where ever they go.
You might be wondering how I know all this and I will tell you. It is not because I am a "sock puppet" of Noel's as Dennis prefers to call me. I am in close contact with this person and I was granted the right to tell Noel's story. Dennis will surely make a big deal over this and discredit me in the next round of his lie fest but I need not be concerned. I know who I am and what I am talking about. Dennis on the other hand, does not.
The hold Noel has over Dennis is astonishing. He obsesses over this person day and night while Noel is simply trying to move on with life. Why does he do this? The reason is simple. Much like a heroin addict needs a fix, Dennis crawls out of his skin when he fails to get a reaction out of Noel. He gets high off Noel and relishes in making this person's life pure misery. Dissatisfied with his own life, his mission is to take what he can from Noel's life and leave an innocent person there for dead. Assassinating Noel's reputation is how he achieves this goal.
He knows like anybody else that the sanctity of a person's good name is extremely valuable. Once that gets ruined, a person has nothing left to lose aside from their own lives. If Noel was to die, that would be Dennis's final victory because then, he could take no more away. The only thing he could do in the aftermath is make himself look more like an insensitive creep by defaming Noel's character beyond human life. This is not something I personally would put past Dennis because he is a maniacal monster.
Dennis likes to portray his website as a "public service" but in actuality, it serves primarily as a means for him to have sweet mental revenge against Noel. Anybody who would invest fourteen years of his life to engage in activities designed to break down another human being truly needs psychological help. Attacking Noel gives Dennis's life more meaning and this is the reason he continues to do it. He sees what he does as necessary but it is only that to him and anybody else looking for a way to get back at Noel through Dennis. They are just as horrid as he is.
Dennis's website is based mainly on his own personal belief that Noel has done all these bad things to him. Only a fraction of the website can be considered credible such as the documentation of websites, groups, petitions, and blogs Noel had previously created about him as a defense tactic after he began his attacks in his groups, all of which he lost as the result of his own ignorance. The court records are in the past but Dennis prefers to keep them current despite the cases having nothing to do with him and all but two being formally dismissed. This is the fact Dennis repeatedly debunks so he can successfully avoid the realization that it was because of the letter he wrote to the courts and materials he furnished that made it possible for Noel to be exonerated. He can remain in denial about this all he wants to but he can never erase the judge's decision to dismiss those cases. Dennis can only hold it over Noel like a life sentence to preserve his precious image by making his lies appear more credible. The cases essentially were none of his business or the public's until he made them that way.
The rest of what he has on there amounts to someone sending him inappropriate e-cards, malicious e-mails, utilizing fake e-mailers, ect. Someone sent them but it does not mean it was Noel. Dennis just likes to claim it was this person to make the website more interesting and damaging to Noel's character.
The infamous Christmas Eve 2012 e-mail is what inspired Dennis to resume his attacks against Noel. He remains fixated on the theory that Noel sent the e-mail in question. Apparently, it never occurred to him that perhaps someone who had it in for Noel was in fact responsible for this. See below the original e-mail which Dennis has proudly presented on his website and used as an excuse to lash out at Noel. You may have to click on the screen shot to view it fully:
All because of this measly, meaningless e-mail, Dennis restarted a cyber war. This could have easily been ignored but then, Dennis would have no meaning to his own life without Noel. Below is a screen shot taken from the blog of the individual I believe is responsible for the e-mail:
See the similarities in writing style? All in "CAPS" just like the e-mail and the general message is clearly against Noel. Who is this character? I will now tell you. He may go by "White Rabbitt" online but his real name is Larry Melton aka Joseph Gallagher and he is a registered sex offender. See the page below for proof:
http://sexoffenders.kens5.com/offender/melton-larry/4736748
and some screen shots from the page in case the information should ever become unavailable:
All perfectly legitimate information on public record unlike the court records Dennis published about Noel that even a background check failed to turn up. Anybody who claims Noel's records are part of the public domain needs their heads examined by a licensed professional. Larry Melton on the other hand should rightfully be considered a prime suspect because of his writing style matching that of the e-mail, his open negative comments about Noel, and the fact he is low enough to be a sex offender, a genuine criminal unlike Noel who was wrongly accused of lesser offenses and has kept out of trouble ever since. It should additionally be noted that Noel was once friendly with Larry Melton before discovering his sordid past. The ties were quickly severed after the discovery that he likes looking at kiddie porn.
I feel I can say with complete certainty, Dennis will attempt to "disprove" this entire article so he can salvage what is left of his dignity. More lies will follow and he might even defend Larry Melton who incidentally is a Charles Manson devotee as shown by the "X" on his forehead. Even Manson himself would be appalled. I can not reveal the identity of the person who led me in the direction of Larry Melton but I will say this person was very close to him and knows him well. If Dennis after seeing this evidence which I feel supports the reasonable doubt theory tries to debunk it in any way by continuing to lay the blame on Noel and/or absolving Larry Melton of any possible responsibility for that Christmas Eve e-mail, then he obviously supports low-life registered sex offenders. For all I know, Dennis could be into that sort of thing himself. If by some strange miracle Dennis admits there is a possibility Larry Melton could have sent the e-mail, this will not only shed a different light on Noel but it will show there is possible hope for Dennis. Either way, the facts I have presented here are tangible and should be taken into consideration. This is a win-win situation for Noel anyhow regardless of the outcome.
What Dennis posts next after reviewing these facts will say a great deal about the content of his character. A true victim would want to get to the bottom of things rather than remain closed off to the possibility someone else could be responsible for attacking them. Dennis can no longer claim to be a victim if he resumes his attacks against Noel after this, and claiming I am doing the writing will not help his case. He will instead prove himself to be the one and only predator. Only that type of individual keeps posting nonsense despite being ignored by his/her target and by disregarding key evidence such as what I have presented here. This article is now concluded.
Wednesday, February 5, 2014
Evidence Of Harassment Against Noel A. Bednaz At The Hands Of Dennis P. McCann.
Here is all the evidence I was able to obtain which proves Dennis P. McCann has been harassing Noel A. Bednaz. It may be necessary to click on the images to view them full sized.
Threats from Dennis on Noel's anti-abuse forum:
E-mail harassment from Dennis to Noel after he was expressly blocked him from Noel's primary e-mail account:
Dennis has made these demands repeatedly through the years expecting that Noel will cave to his wishes. Now ask yourself the following questions. Who initiated the contact first? Noel or Dennis? Are these e-mails and forum comments the actions of someone who is being stalked or by someone who is the stalker? You decide.
Threatening e-mail from Dennis to Noel. This was reported to Yahoo:
Dennis back peddling on his own words. First in an e-mail to me and then on his own website:
Here is where Dennis confirms the infamous "Christmas Eve" message is what prompted him to restore the website. Yet in his e-mail to me, he makes it appear insignificant. It was clearly significant enough for him to begin attacking Noel again after seven years of silence. Additionally, he claims to never have sent Noel anything. Sure, that is why we have e-mails and forum comments here proving his statement is a flat out lie. Did the Tooth Fairy make those comments and send those e-mails to Noel? I think not! The way Dennis flaunts his alleged accomplishments by declaring: "I'm a University Professor with paintings on five continents" says a great deal about the extent of his enormous ego. Are we supposed to be impressed that someone who claims to hold these credentials is stalking an innocent person all the while he is playing the victim game? Can we honestly take his word at face value that Noel is allegedly stalking him when he eludes presenting any tangible proof of his accusations? Again, I think not!
Another victim tells his story about abuse from Dennis:
Some time later, Joe Viglione became a turncoat against Noel. This indicates his personal issues with Dennis had enough relevance to involve Noel in his twisted games. His statements against Dennis did prove to be credible however.
Dennis makes an attempt to bait Noel into a reaction to his attacks:
Again, Dennis flaunts himself by declaring: "I have two Master's Degrees, am a University Professor, and have paintings on five continents" thus giving off the impression his alleged status is something all of us are supposed to be impressed with. Anybody can achieve these things but it does not mean they are upstanding people. Ted Bundy studied law and later became a psychology major with high honors but he was a serial rapist and murderer. I rest my case with that! As for the rest of the horrible things Dennis declared about Noel, one can only conclude he has a deep hatred which reflects in his various rants. For him to declare "the website will be up long after you're dust. You've earned that" is quite obtuse and arrogant. Furthermore, he keeps insisting that if Noel does what he demands, "all this will be over" when it is plain he wants to continue this indefinitely.
Dennis uses Noel's personal anguish and denies he has caused any pain:
This is someone who claims Noel is the stalker and posts rotten things like this. Oh, but he has "never written anything about Noel" right?
Dennis implies an "end to this" once again but continues to bait Noel into a reaction:
Notice the deliberate reversal strategy Dennis uses to place the blame at Noel's feet? This "nice woman" whom Dennis alleges was attacked by Noel is a fan of his and a fellow stalker named Devon Bell whom has victimized Suzanne Poirier over the loss of a man. The man supposedly left Devon for Suzanne and a jealous rage from Devon's end ensued. If Devon Bell is so "nice" as Dennis states, then so is a rabid dog.
The latest threat e-mail from Dennis to Noel with complete headers:
The address has been redacted at the request of the actual home owner whom is not Noel as Dennis assumes. As mentioned in a previous article I have written, Noel simply had a package delivered to this address in an effort to protect the true address Noel resides at. This is a fact Dennis refuses to acknowledge. After seeing this final piece of evidence proving Dennis to be the initiator of the contact with Noel, there should be no doubt as to who the aggressor is. Sure, all alleged stalking victims repeatedly go out of their way to make contact with the person they insist is stalking them. Right? Here is something else to ponder. Noel in all these years has adamantly denied all of the accusations made by Dennis. If this person was truly guilty of the offenses and knowing how badly Noel wants the pain to end, you would think by now Noel would meet the demands of Dennis. Why should there be an admission of guilt where there is none just to get Dennis to stop the abuse though? To me, that makes no sense for anybody to do. This "evidence" Dennis claims he has against Noel is non-factual and is based purely on his own notions that everything was sent by this person. This includes the infamous "Christmas Eve" message he has blamed on Noel since the website was restored. He uses various excuses to elude having to present tangible proof that Noel sent that message and thus, started things back up with him again. Does it make sense that Noel would stir things up after seven years of peace without Dennis's crooked antics? Any educated person would see that it does not make sense. Especially after seeing the following messages Noel sent to Dennis conveying the clear desire to have no further dealings with him.
The only messages Noel sent to Dennis during this recent period of harassment:
As of this point, Noel has not written another word nor reacted to the abuse from Dennis in any way. Additionally, Noel voluntarily deleted personal blogs in an effort to initiate a peaceful resolution. Dennis was non-receptive to this and he continues to assume Noel owns other blogs as well including mine. These are the blogs he expects to be removed by Noel. News flash, Noel can not remove what others create! Noel is only responsible for personal blogs. I am responsible for mine, and the others are the responsibility of their respectable owners. I can not speak for the others but my blogs will remain available for public viewing until Dennis ends his vindictive attacks against Noel. If you have been a victim of Dennis P. McCann's, please leave a comment letting me know. I will add any additional abuse evidence to this blog and your identity will be kept confidential.
Threats from Dennis on Noel's anti-abuse forum:
E-mail harassment from Dennis to Noel after he was expressly blocked him from Noel's primary e-mail account:
Dennis has made these demands repeatedly through the years expecting that Noel will cave to his wishes. Now ask yourself the following questions. Who initiated the contact first? Noel or Dennis? Are these e-mails and forum comments the actions of someone who is being stalked or by someone who is the stalker? You decide.
Threatening e-mail from Dennis to Noel. This was reported to Yahoo:
Dennis back peddling on his own words. First in an e-mail to me and then on his own website:
Here is where Dennis confirms the infamous "Christmas Eve" message is what prompted him to restore the website. Yet in his e-mail to me, he makes it appear insignificant. It was clearly significant enough for him to begin attacking Noel again after seven years of silence. Additionally, he claims to never have sent Noel anything. Sure, that is why we have e-mails and forum comments here proving his statement is a flat out lie. Did the Tooth Fairy make those comments and send those e-mails to Noel? I think not! The way Dennis flaunts his alleged accomplishments by declaring: "I'm a University Professor with paintings on five continents" says a great deal about the extent of his enormous ego. Are we supposed to be impressed that someone who claims to hold these credentials is stalking an innocent person all the while he is playing the victim game? Can we honestly take his word at face value that Noel is allegedly stalking him when he eludes presenting any tangible proof of his accusations? Again, I think not!
Another victim tells his story about abuse from Dennis:
Some time later, Joe Viglione became a turncoat against Noel. This indicates his personal issues with Dennis had enough relevance to involve Noel in his twisted games. His statements against Dennis did prove to be credible however.
Dennis makes an attempt to bait Noel into a reaction to his attacks:
Again, Dennis flaunts himself by declaring: "I have two Master's Degrees, am a University Professor, and have paintings on five continents" thus giving off the impression his alleged status is something all of us are supposed to be impressed with. Anybody can achieve these things but it does not mean they are upstanding people. Ted Bundy studied law and later became a psychology major with high honors but he was a serial rapist and murderer. I rest my case with that! As for the rest of the horrible things Dennis declared about Noel, one can only conclude he has a deep hatred which reflects in his various rants. For him to declare "the website will be up long after you're dust. You've earned that" is quite obtuse and arrogant. Furthermore, he keeps insisting that if Noel does what he demands, "all this will be over" when it is plain he wants to continue this indefinitely.
Dennis uses Noel's personal anguish and denies he has caused any pain:
This is someone who claims Noel is the stalker and posts rotten things like this. Oh, but he has "never written anything about Noel" right?
Dennis implies an "end to this" once again but continues to bait Noel into a reaction:
Notice the deliberate reversal strategy Dennis uses to place the blame at Noel's feet? This "nice woman" whom Dennis alleges was attacked by Noel is a fan of his and a fellow stalker named Devon Bell whom has victimized Suzanne Poirier over the loss of a man. The man supposedly left Devon for Suzanne and a jealous rage from Devon's end ensued. If Devon Bell is so "nice" as Dennis states, then so is a rabid dog.
The latest threat e-mail from Dennis to Noel with complete headers:
The address has been redacted at the request of the actual home owner whom is not Noel as Dennis assumes. As mentioned in a previous article I have written, Noel simply had a package delivered to this address in an effort to protect the true address Noel resides at. This is a fact Dennis refuses to acknowledge. After seeing this final piece of evidence proving Dennis to be the initiator of the contact with Noel, there should be no doubt as to who the aggressor is. Sure, all alleged stalking victims repeatedly go out of their way to make contact with the person they insist is stalking them. Right? Here is something else to ponder. Noel in all these years has adamantly denied all of the accusations made by Dennis. If this person was truly guilty of the offenses and knowing how badly Noel wants the pain to end, you would think by now Noel would meet the demands of Dennis. Why should there be an admission of guilt where there is none just to get Dennis to stop the abuse though? To me, that makes no sense for anybody to do. This "evidence" Dennis claims he has against Noel is non-factual and is based purely on his own notions that everything was sent by this person. This includes the infamous "Christmas Eve" message he has blamed on Noel since the website was restored. He uses various excuses to elude having to present tangible proof that Noel sent that message and thus, started things back up with him again. Does it make sense that Noel would stir things up after seven years of peace without Dennis's crooked antics? Any educated person would see that it does not make sense. Especially after seeing the following messages Noel sent to Dennis conveying the clear desire to have no further dealings with him.
The only messages Noel sent to Dennis during this recent period of harassment:
As of this point, Noel has not written another word nor reacted to the abuse from Dennis in any way. Additionally, Noel voluntarily deleted personal blogs in an effort to initiate a peaceful resolution. Dennis was non-receptive to this and he continues to assume Noel owns other blogs as well including mine. These are the blogs he expects to be removed by Noel. News flash, Noel can not remove what others create! Noel is only responsible for personal blogs. I am responsible for mine, and the others are the responsibility of their respectable owners. I can not speak for the others but my blogs will remain available for public viewing until Dennis ends his vindictive attacks against Noel. If you have been a victim of Dennis P. McCann's, please leave a comment letting me know. I will add any additional abuse evidence to this blog and your identity will be kept confidential.
Mission Statement.
The purpose of this blog is to present evidence proving that Dennis P. McCann is an internet stalker. For the past fourteen years, he has been targeting an innocent person named Noel A. Bednaz. His obsession with Noel has no boundaries and he has literally gone out of his way to assassinate this person's reputation. He claims Noel is the aggressor while repeatedly inflicting more abuse. He expresses a desire for all this to end but continues to bait his victim in an effort to get a reaction. Additionally, he implies that Noel's supporters, including myself, are "sock puppets" because of his need to believe Noel is standing alone. I have attested previously that I do in fact exist. If Dennis wants to believe otherwise, that is his delusion. My level of concern about what he thinks is zero. The level of concern I have for Noel is of the utmost importance. The evidence I will present on this blog should clear up any misunderstandings others have as to who the real stalker is. I ask you educated readers, please review the facts and judge accordingly. Thank you!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)